Tag: 上海kb最新地方


Kerala HC Issues Notice On Plea Challenging Denial Of Refund For Flight Tickets Booked Before Lockdown


first_imgNews UpdatesKerala HC Issues Notice On Plea Challenging Denial Of Refund For Flight Tickets Booked Before Lockdown LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK24 Jun 2020 7:04 AMShare This – xThe High Court of Kerala on Wednesday issued notice on a plea filed by two law students Sivadath. M.Menon and Aravind Chandran K.P of Government Law College, Kozhikode, who are primarily aggrieved by the notification dated 16.04.2020 of the Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) for denying full refund to tickets booked before lockdown for travel during the period for which lockdown…Your free access to Live Law has expiredTo read the article, get a premium account.Your Subscription Supports Independent JournalismSubscription starts from ₹ 599+GST (For 6 Months)View PlansPremium account gives you:Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.Subscribe NowAlready a subscriber?LoginThe High Court of Kerala on Wednesday issued notice on a plea filed by two law students Sivadath. M.Menon and Aravind Chandran K.P of Government Law College, Kozhikode, who are primarily aggrieved by the notification dated 16.04.2020 of the Director General of Civil Aviation (DGCA) for denying full refund to tickets booked before lockdown for travel during the period for which lockdown was imposed subsequently.A single bench of Justice V G Arun sought the responses of DGCA, Air India and Indigo Airlines.The petitioners urge that the DGCA notification dated 16.04.2020 artificially classifies Air Line passengers on the basis of date of booking, date of payment and date of travel for the purpose of giving full refund of the Air Tickets. The notification states that only two category of passengers are entitled for full refund of Air Tickets – the first category comprise passengers who had booked tickets between 25.03.2020 and 14.04.2020 and where the respective airline had received the full payment towards the ticket between 25.03.2020 and 14.04.2020 and the second category comprising of passengers who had booked tickets (domestic or international) between 25.03.2020 and 14.04.2020 for travelling between 15.04.2020 and 03.05.2020, where the respective airline had received the full payment towards the ticket between 25.03.2020 and 14.04.2020. The petitioners who booked tickets on 12.02.2020 to travel to Delhi on 24.05.2020 and booked return tickets on 03.04.2020 to travel to back on 06.06.2020 do not fall within in these categories. This is challenged as “arbitrary and unlawful cancellation violative of Article 14 of the Constitution”.  The petitioners contend that the passengers who could not travel on flights due to lockdown forms a indivisible homogeneous class. Further, the petitioners questioned the default credit shell mechanism in Indigo Airlines wherein a substantial amount of the ticket fare automatically pipes into the credit shell of the passenger upon cancellation of the tickets. The petitioners also point out that the non transfer-ability of credit shell coupled with its 1 year validity puts the interest of the petitioners at peril as they are not frequent air travellers. It is also pointed out that the default credit shell mechanism is contrary to the Civil Aviation Rules under the Air Craft Act, 1934. The policy of Air India Ltd which provides full refund to only those passengers who had booked prior to 25.05.2020 for travelling between 25.05.2020 and 31.05.2020 is also contested by the petitioners.   The petitioners are represented by Advocates Gajendra Singh Rajpurohit, Akhil George, Thanseela M.B, Karthik Rajagopal and Mahesh Chandran. Next Storylast_img read more


One for the road


first_imgWould you like to read more?Register for free to finish this article.Sign up now for the following benefits:Four FREE articles of your choice per monthBreaking news, comment and analysis from industry experts as it happensChoose from our portfolio of email newsletters To access this article REGISTER NOWWould you like print copies, app and digital replica access too? SUBSCRIBE for as little as £5 per week.last_img


Montana State looks to sweep Sac State


first_imgMontana State looks to sweep Sac State Share This StoryFacebookTwitteremailPrintLinkedinRedditMontana State (14-13, 8-8) vs. Sacramento State (14-12, 7-10)The Hornets Nest, Sacramento, California; Thursday, 10:05 p.m. ESTBOTTOM LINE: Sacramento State seeks revenge on Montana State after dropping the first matchup in Bozeman. The teams last met on Dec. 28, when the Bobcats shot 42.4 percent from the field while limiting Sacramento State’s shooters to just 34 percent en route to a 15-point victory. For more AP college basketball coverage: https://apnews.com/Collegebasketball and http://twitter.com/AP_Top25___This was generated by Automated Insights, http://www.automatedinsights.com/ap, using data from STATS LLC, https://www.stats.com February 26, 2020center_img STEPPING UP: Sacramento State’s Joshua Patton has averaged 12.9 points, 5.4 rebounds and two blocks while Izayah Mauriohooho-Le’afa has put up 10 points. For the Bobcats, Harald Frey has averaged 16.7 points, 4.5 rebounds and 4.7 assists while Amin Adamu has put up 12.2 points and 5.4 rebounds.FREY IS A FORCE: Frey has connected on 33.3 percent of the 162 3-pointers he’s attempted and has made 4 of 17 over the last three games. He’s also made 87.7 percent of his free throws this season.SLIPPING AT 71: Montana State is 0-9 when it allows at least 71 points and 14-4 when it holds opponents to less than 71.LONG-RANGE THREAT: Montana State’s Adamu has attempted 29 3-pointers and has connected on 20.7 percent of them.DID YOU KNOW: The Sacramento State defense has allowed only 58.8 points per game to opponents this season, ranking the Hornets sixth among Division I teams. The Montana State offense has averaged 67.3 points through 27 games (ranked 248th, nationally).___ Associated Press last_img read more